Ronnie Long was convicted by an all-white jury in North Carolina on Oct. 1, 1976, after he was accused of raping a white woman in Concord.

A Black North Carolina man who spent 44 years in prison after he was wrongfully convicted of raping a prominent white woman has been awarded a historic $25 million settlement more than three years after he was exonerated.

Ronnie Long, 68, settled his civil lawsuit with the city of Concord, about 25 miles northeast of Charlotte, for $22 million, the city said in a news release Tuesday. The North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation had previously settled for $3 million, according to Duke Law School’s Wrongful Convictions Clinic.

The clinic, which represented Long, said the settlement is the second largest wrongful conviction settlement recorded.

“It’s, obviously, a celebratory day today knowing that Ronnie’s going to have his means met for the rest of his life with this settlement. It’s been a long road to get to this point so that’s a great outcome,” clinical professor Jamie Lau, Long’s criminal attorney, said in a phone interview Tuesday.

    • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      11 months ago

      Bruh. Quoted from the article:

      "They said that the prosecution’s main piece of evidence was the victim’s identification of Long weeks after the attack and that it was “the product of a suggestive identification procedure arranged by the police to target Long.”

      There were also numerous pieces of evidence from the scene, including suspect hair and 43 fingerprints, that could have helped exonerate him, according to his attorneys. The material, which they said did not belong to Long, was tested by investigators but not disclosed. The attorneys also accused Concord police officers of giving false testimony about the evidence at Long’s trial."

      It sounds like she was led by the police, and all evidence pointing to the contrary was tossed out.

      • fidodo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Seriously. If you’re raped you don’t think “finding my real rapist would be great, but what I would rather do is get some random guy sent to prison because I don’t like black people”

        • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          11 months ago

          Bruh, it sounds like she was coerced and lead. She likely believed she that she had selected the correct person.

          Plus, how is this not on the courts and jurors? They had actual evidence matching someone else that would have exonerated him, they purposefully ensured that he was judged by an all white jury, and they coerced/lead the victim.

          Come on now guys, we all fucking know that police play head games with people to get BS confessions. This isn’t hard. They wanted a conviction, and they did whatever they could to get one, no matter whether it was the correct perpetrator or not.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not so simple. There’s known cases where rape survivors are gaslit by cops into identifying the wrong person as the rapist.

      • mriormro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        11 months ago

        "Although Concord police had a photo of Long to show Bost, they decided on another route. They asked her to accompany them to the courthouse on May 10, telling Bost that the man who raped her might or might not be present. Bost sat in the second row, disguised with a red wig and sunglasses.

        When Long’s case came up an hour or so later, he walked around to the defense table, wearing a flowered leisure shirt and a medium-length brown leather jacket. Even before Long spoke, Bost notified the officers that Long was her attacker. Later, at the police station, Bost picked Long’s photo out of an array. He was the only person in the array wearing a leather jacket."

        [Source]

    • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 months ago

      That really should depend.

      It’s fucked, but there needs to be malicious intent behind it. If she was actually raped, and really did believe thus guy did it, then no, we shouldn’t be sending actual rape victims to prison.

      There’s a difference between a false ID you believe to be true and a false ID given maliciously.

      • fidodo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Blindly reacting to shit and demanding retribution without thinking is exactly how injustices like this happen in the first place.