• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 months ago

    Atatürk died 10 years before Israel became a state. So I’m guessing his stance would be “what are you talking about?”

    • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      You know what my point is, man. I’ve seen you make it yourself.

      When someone conflates concerns with one aspect of a belief system with a vile hatred of all members of that culture, it’s an argument in bad faith.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Okay, but no one was making that argument before Atatürk died. That’s not really what the Zionism movement was saying at the time. There was plenty of real antisemitism what with the whole Adolf Hitler thing…

    • sik0fewl@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Well, the Zionist movement and the plan to create a Jewish state in Palestine dates back another 50 years – a time when Palestine was a part of the Ottoman Empire, so if he was familiar with it I’m sure he had some opinion.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        The movement was very different before Israel was a state. There were militant branches, but it was not an overall militant movement and the idea of the displacement, let alone the apartheid and eventual genocide of Palestinians was far from universal. And really, in the 1930s, the focus was more getting as many Jews out of Europe as possible.

        EDIT: FWIW, I just found this-

        Now in his mid-twenties, Mustafa Kemal was obsessed with the idea of Westernizing the Ottoman Empire. While in Palestine, he went to Jerusalem in order to seek the counsel of Eliezer Ben-Yehuda. Revealed in his 2011 biography of Mustafa Kemal, Princeton scholar M. Sukru Hanioglu writes that the young officer hoped to understand from Ben-Yehuda how he had managed to reinvent the Hebrew language after millennia of disuse and make it a cornerstone of Zionist culture. Mustafa Kemal would mimic this feat in 1928 by changing the Turkish alphabet from Arabic to Latin characters. Though we know little of his attitude towards the Zionist project, Mustafa Kemal’s encounter with Ben-Yehuda shows that he was acutely aware of the tiny Jewish renaissance that was taking place in Palestine, and he may have seen it as a validation of the nationalist enterprise he would launch several years later.

        https://www.thetower.org/article/ataturk-ben-gurion-and-turkeys-road-not-taken/

        So it sounds like he was at least somewhat sympathetic to some Zionist ideas in the 1930s.

        • sik0fewl@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Good find. Your Google skills are better than mine… or maybe I just gave up too soon.

          I did find on Wikipedia, though, that the original Zionist plans were for a secular state with majority Jewish citizens, so yeah, definitely not what we have today.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Not really surprising since Moses Hess was a socialist Jew who inspired both Karl Marx’s ideas on communism and Theodore Herzl’s ideas on Zionism. Hess did become religious later in life, but when he was at his peak, he was inspired by the Jewish philosopher Spinoza (who was very close to an atheist) and Renaissance humanists. I have read that Herzl was an atheist too, but I’ve never tried to confirm it. I do know that, as you said, his vision of Israel was of a secular state and his impetus was mostly “Jews need to get the fuck out of Europe before we’re all killed.” And he was pretty much right, unfortunately.