• GrymEdm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    150
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    There is no way that murdering top Iranian officials in an Iranian embassy on Syrian soil was ever going to be anything but a gauntlet thrown down. If it was almost any other country than Israel the world would be outraged. Countries like the USA and Germany didn’t pull support because of things like destroying hospitals and killing innocents, so bombing the embassy of a country as reviled as Iran inside Syria wasn’t going to stop them.

    Netanyahu knows his days in power are done very shortly after Israel leaves a condition of all-out war. Biden has told him that, his polls tell him that, and protestors tell him that. I think he’s poking the local bears to escalate and stay in power by extending the conflict. Both Biden and Trump have promised support so Netanyahu is acting with the backing of the world’s largest military no matter who wins. Pulling the USA and other Western countries into another war in the Middle East is his best bet of pushing that day of reckoning way down the road.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      7 months ago

      This was a completely blatant provocation in order to move the theater to Iran and keep the war footing going. If Iran were smart, they’d make a quick foray to quiet home pressure then just pull back and let Bibi wind down and face his corruption trial if he gets forced out of leveling Gaza because of international condemnation.

      Israel, you can do better than this prick. Get your shit together or you’re going to get left to your own devices and the rest of the world will just come in and pick up the pieces afterwards.

      • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I must admit my own ignorance about South American parallels, but I’m legitimately interested. I wouldn’t ask you to do my research for me, but do you have a good starting point to recommend?

      • Nutteman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        85
        ·
        7 months ago

        No, I’m gonna thank the people who attacked an Iranian embassy. Fucking zionists and genocide apologists really love to jump at the chance to blame Hamas for everything, especially Israel’s own fuckups, huh.

        • bobburger@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          Hamas could stop the invasion of Gaza at any time by releasing the hostages and disarming. Instead the Hamas leadership are big chillin in Qatar living the good life escalating the violence every chance they get.

          If Hamas hadn’t attacked Israel on October 7th, Hezbollah wouldn’t have ramped up rocket attacks on Israel in response to the Gaza invasion. Then Israel wouldn’t have needed to target the Iranian general helping to fund and coordinate the attacks from Syria.

          The middle east is a giant cluster fuck of bad actors being funded by Iran in an effort to destabilize the west and eradicate Israel. The west defends Israel because if they didn’t then the surrounding Arab states would absolutely destroy the country of Israel and do their best to enact a second Holocaust of any Jewish people they could get their hands on.

          There are no “good guys” in any of these conflicts, especially not Hamas or Iran. Because of Israel, Hamas, and Iran the Gaza civilians are being punished.

          Don’t say any stupid shit like I’m a Zionist or genocide apologists just because I understand that Hamas doesn’t really give a fuck about Palestinian civilians.

          • Nutteman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            7 months ago

            I have oppositional defiance disorder. You are a zionist and a genocide apologist, big time.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            7 months ago

            Hamas could stop the invasion of Gaza at any time by releasing the hostages and disarming. Instead the Hamas leadership are big chillin in Qatar living the good life escalating the violence every chance they get.

            I’m going to go out on a limb and assume you haven’t heard Netanyahu repeatedly say the hostages aren’t the end of it? That they have to destroy Hamas too? And that’s a pretty glib statement for the guys currently standing on the wrong side of the border.

            Just like the Russians saying Ukraine can end the war at any time with total surrender. Just let them win and do whatever they want then it will totally be over, we swear! There’s no way they will continue to kill civilians, occupy land that isn’t theirs, and bring in more settlers. /s

            The oppressors would love it if any resistance just went away.

          • zbyte64@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I understand that Hamas doesn’t really give a fuck about Palestinian civilians

            Then it would be ridiculous to expect Hamas to change tactics for the sake of Palestinians…

            Hamas could stop the invasion of Gaza at any time by releasing the hostages and disarming.

            And Hamas will do all that as soon as they start caring for Palestinians? They literally have nothing to loose at this point.

      • Kalkaline @leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        69
        ·
        7 months ago

        Ok, sure Hamas attacked, kidnapped and killed civilians, with 1200+ killed and another 5000+ injured.

        Israel retaliated by killing 13,000+ kids and 8,000+ women, with 33,000+ killed since then.

        I’d say that’s a disproportionate response.

        • Count042@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          7 months ago

          Remember, those numbers are from around 3-4 weeks ago. There isn’t any mechanism for continuing the count, which is why the number hasn’t changed as starvation kicks in.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            7 months ago

            We would have those numbers if Israel didn’t shoot at the aid agencies responsible for measuring and countering food insecurity.

          • sudo@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Its going to be like Yemen where the official death count hovered around 4 thousand for years and then one day it was “oops it’s 400 thousand now, gee how did that happen?”

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          7 months ago

          You’re forgetting something. 30% of those numbers from October 7th are Israeli military. And yeah it was bad that they killed so many civilians. But this number gets thrown around like they were on an unopposed rampage. Then there’s the fact that Israelis near Palestinian borders tend to be well armed and a picture of an actual fight begins to emerge.

          • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 months ago

            Most of the Israelis who live near Gaza are peace activists and environmental activists who live there to help build peaceful relations with Palestine.

          • sudo@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            There’s also the fact that Israel’s response to 10/7 was tanks and helicopters. Hamas didn’t level any kibbutz’s, the IDF did, because Hamas was there. Any kibbutzniks who died from friendly fire were blamed on Hamas.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            The guerilla doesn’t need to win, just not lose. The correct response if you actually want to end the fighting is to attack the Idea. Which turns out to be a careful balancing act of of fighting radicals while respecting and helping the local population.

            This is… Not that.

            • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              You are describing the American response to the Taliban. I suspect Israel saw what happened in Afghanistan and decided that it wasn’t the “correct response” after all.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                It’s a bit more than just that. If you look at successful counter insurgencies throughout history then you see it’s the defining trait. Afghanistan is an example of what happens when you try to change the culture at the same time, have a corrupt reporting chain that doesn’t report failure, and the enemy can hide in the next country over. You can do everything right and still lose, and we didn’t do everything right.

                • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  Fair enough.

                  Still, I’m not sure if Israel is even performing a counterinsurgency operation. Hamas was in control of the government of Gaza, after all. This may have more in common with a regime change, or some hybrid of the two.

        • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s not what proportional warfare means.

          It has nothing to do with the numbers being proportional on two sides. It’s whether the military response is proportional to the military goal. The military goal in this case is the defeat of an embedded terrorist organization and return of hostages.

          • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            7 months ago

            By that definition Israel is failing to meet its military goal. Killing SO MANY innocent civilians would be considered a military failure by any other western county.

            Unless the goal is collective punishment and not proportional warfare.

            • AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              7 months ago

              Yup, a total failure. They’re currently at -2. They’ve rescued no hostages and killed two “by accident”. The only time Israel got hostages was when the military was put on a leash during a ceasefire and they traded some of their own Palestinian hostages.

              • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                7 months ago

                Israel does not keep or have Palestinian hostages.

                You are trying to establish a moral equivalence between kidnapping civilians from their homes and arresting suspected or convicted criminals. They are not the same thing and equating them only muddies the waters on the real underlying issues.

                • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  No, my argument is that Western armies consider that the expected casualty rate for wartime.

                  The UN prefers zero casualties, and also zero war. But Western armies rarely live up to UN ideals.

            • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              I disagree, but at least you are understanding the correct meaning of proportionality and we can have a discussion.

                • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  While it is impossible to have an accurate count, the best estimates are that about 1/3 of those killed have been combatants. The UN estimates 90% civilian casualties across all wars. The Iraq war was similar in that it involved urban, embedded terror groups and modern technology. The civilian casualty ratio was 77%. This war is in line with other conflicts of the past 50 years.

                  It is still a terrible tragedy. War is always a tragedy.

          • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 months ago

            The people that told you that are mentally insane, so you know. I know it feels good to have a rationalisation and that they seem reasonable. but they are emotionally immature men that have traumas preventing them from growing up correctly and now they are in a psychosis.

            No, nothing about any one killing anyone is about a military target goal. It’s not justified to do these things. Just like it was and is not justified by the terrorists to do them. Stop being a fool really that thinks this is normal to do, to slay an entire people. What the fuck man.

            • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              7 months ago

              You are not upset with me, you are upset with the definition of a word.

              Obviously we all want a peaceful world, but when you have a group like Hamas that believe their god wants them to kill anyone who is not their form of extremist religion, how can you end violence without eliminating them? Israel tried for decades to avoid this type if direct conflict. That avoidance cost them and led to the deadliest day in all Israeli history.

              • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                7 months ago

                Huh? No.

                There are literal international laws, and people who spend their entire life around the science of proportional military action. It’s so much more than a word you can define.

                It is after a genocide people wonder what the fuck happened. But a few wonders right the fuck now what the fuck is happening.

                Military petsonell over the world work with you know real horrible game theory politics considerations that are mentally insane and some of these military spheres has completely lost their shit and are currently spiraling into the TELLTALE TEXTBOOK definition of the cycle where they become destructive and the world suffers from the consequences for years.

                It is repeating history. I don’t hate a word, I hate that you defend it with no objective partials

          • magnusrufus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            You said that very incorrectly. It’s not solely about numbers but numbers are absolutely a fundamental factor.

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          This is a war. What makes you think war is supposed to be proportionate?

          How many American civilians were killed at Pearl Harbor? There were 68.

          How many Japanese civilians were subsequently killed by Americans? About 500,000.

          Americans weren’t obligated to stop when Japanese civilian casualties outnumbered American civilian casualties. They were only obligated to stop when Japan surrendered.

          • Miaou@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            7 months ago

            Who’s supposed to surrender? Theres no government, it’s not a war, it’s a massacre.

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            7 months ago

            A “war” as you’re mentioning it is very different than what’s happening here.

            Sure, in a total war, massive nation state war , if one side blunders and gets a whole army, or a whole city obliterated, that’s just war. (I’m not condoning or calling for total war, anywhere. Just explaining a difference)

            This is absolutely not that.

          • sudo@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Ah yes, Israel is just doing what the US did in Japan, Korea, and Vietnam. Very apt comparison.

            Also the US killed way more that 500,000 Japanese civilians in WWII. Your just counting the atom bombs. We had leveled multiple cities with conventional and fire bombs before that.

            • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              No, I’m counting total casualties. Roughly 200,000 in all were killed by the atomic bombings.

        • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          Proportional response would have been to storm gaza and rape, torture and murder 1200+ palestinians - mostly civilians.

      • Rookwood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        65
        ·
        7 months ago

        Hamas did not bomb an embassy on foreign soil. Hamas has not been committing war crimes for the last 6 months.

          • Nutteman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            52
            ·
            7 months ago

            Okay, well Israel glassed half the strip and killed 33,000 people. They went past self defense or even basic revenge about 32,000 people ago. Any other half-assed attempt to justify a genocide?

            • rayyy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              7 months ago

              Biden has been on Netanyahu’s ass since the beginning but Israel keeps digging the hole deeper. Israel will discover, too late, that they doomed themselves - Biden tried and tried to tell them. Netanyahu, Putin and Trump are all cut from the same cloth. They are all losers waiting for the curtain to close on them.

              • Nutteman@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                7 months ago

                Biden kisses Bibi’s ass you mean. Biden could have stopped this at any time by withholding weapons and money.

            • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              7 months ago

              And Iran is sending dozens of drones and missiles because 16 Iranians were killed.

              Nobody is interested in limiting themselves to self defense.

              • Nutteman@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                31
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                On an embassy. And Iran’s targeting non civilian infrastructure. Which Israel hadn’t had the decency to do. Man, wherever you live has an education system that failed you completely.

                • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  So? Human lives in embassies are not more precious than whoever Iran is trying to kill right now.

            • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              genocide

              According to the 1948 international genocide convention, genocide constitutes “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group.”

              There were around 250,000 people in Gaza in 1948. There are now more than 2 million.

              • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                7 months ago

                Holy shit, wow, it’s the exact same thing Nazis say about the Holocaust, just with different parties involved.

              • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                7 months ago

                There were 16 million Jews in Europe before the Holocaust. History tends to focus on how many were lost.

                I’m not waiting until after Israel succeeds at this before I call it what it is.

            • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              7 months ago

              Whataboutism doesn’t change the fact that Hamas has been targeting Israeli civilian population with rockets for years. Two things can be true at the same time.

              • cybersin@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Did hamas limit the food, water, and electric going into Israel too? Was Hamas making settlements inside Israel? Was Hamas controlling the border and movement of Israelis? Was Hamas controlling the outcome of Israels elections?

                Hamas bad, but Israel made Hamas.

                • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Did hamas limit the food, water, and electric going into Israel too?

                  They would if they could. Instead they took the aid meant for their population and used it to build tunnels and rockets effectively resulting in the same thing except they’re doing it to their own population.

              • Nutteman@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                7 months ago

                Not before they were created as a response to Israeli occupation in '87… Israel forced Palestinians into gaza and the west Bank in the late 40s. So around 50 years of trying to deal with occupation without Hamas. That’s a long time to be subjugated and not have some sort of extremist group gain power. So if we do the math… yeah israel and the colonial powers that helped create it have been the bad guy far more often than Hamas. By raw body count alone Israel comes out looking like a monster.

        • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 months ago

          Blindly shooting rockets at the civilian population in Israel for years, raping and murdering civilians on october 7th and using their own civilian population as human shields are few that come to mind.

          • cybersin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            7 months ago

            IDF drops bombs on the homes of any man, killing entire families at once. “Human shields” do not exist, there is no point. The IDF has shown they will happily shoot through the civilians anyways.

              • bamboo@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                7 months ago

                Well most of it is unsubstantiated lies propagated by Israel, so yes. It is probable that Hamas has fired rockets into civilian areas, but I don’t think there’s any evidence on the rest of it.

        • qdJzXuisAndVQb2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          Moron. Hamas commit war crimes as a matter of course. How can you be so intellectually dishonest in your arguments?!

          • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 months ago

            Israel did bomb an embassy on foreign soil. Israel has been committing war crimes for the last 6 months.

            • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              I agree.

              I’m confused with the statement that Hamas has not been committing war crimes though: clarification about the last 6 months seems to be added for manipulative reasons.

      • Kokesh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        7 months ago

        Fuck Hamas. But fuck Israel also. They’re not crazy idiotic islam nuts. They simply used what those islamist fuckers did to start genocide of innocent people. Fuck Netanyahu, fuck whole state if Israel. They got down to nazi level.

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yes, I think both sides are full of hatred for the other, they have been at de facto war for years, and they both think escalation is a good strategy.

          The results are predictable.

  • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Holy shit, the thread about this on .ml is absolutely disgusting. Masks are completely off.

    And I see all the hexbear .world alts are out in force in this thread as well.

    • AbackDeckWARLORD@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I never understood why people constantly bring up other instances in threads. Why even mention it? If there’s no external attention on it, then it can be quarantined there

      • sudo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Effective tactics but I’m not sure they have the strength to pull it off. Its extremely high risk so unless you have a critical mass of protestors only the most ardent supporters will show up and probably be outnumbered by cops.

        But I’m arm chair generaling here. I want to believe. Hope they have a bailfund set up.

  • MagicShel@programming.devOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    7 months ago

    Nutshell:

    • Iran has launched more than 100 drones toward Israel.
    • The Biden administration expects Iran will also launch dozens of cruise missiles and dozens of ballistic missiles.
    • It will be hours before the drones arrive.
    • garretble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      ·
      7 months ago

      The Biden administration expects Iran will also launch dozens of cruise missiles and dozens of ballistic missiles targeting Israeli government sites, not civilians or religious sites, a US official said.

      TFW Iran is doing war stuff more humanely than Israel has been for the last seven months.

      • MysticDaedra@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        What if Israeli government sites were located inside the homes of Israeli civilians? What if Israeli military sites were located underneath Israeli hospitals? Would that grant Israel immunity against Iran? Because your line of reasoning would be that the only way to prevent war is to put civilians in harms way, as Hamas has done repeatedly.

        • Skates@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Since we’re 'what if’ing, what if we bombed the shit out of every Israeli embassy in every country?

        • garretble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          7 months ago

          What if some people were giving food aid to Israel and they told Iran they were going to give aid…then their aid vans were bombed by Iran anyway?

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 months ago

    This entire war is a lesson that politicians who promote “security” over peace will end up with a less secure country than what they inherited.

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 months ago

    I worry we’re weeks or months away from nuclear war at this point :( Sad day for humanity that these wars keep getting bigger instead.

  • Kokesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    I hope they’ll get what they deserve for everything they did in the last months. Genocidal state.

    • shameless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      I hope their government does, however I do not support the inevitable impact this will have on their civilians.

      • Agrivar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Why? Fuck 'em I say. More ethnic Jews live in America, the rest of them could have just come here instead of insisting on that stupid chunk of contested desert. The settler types over there are the WORST.

    • MagicShel@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      7 months ago

      I have a huge issue with the government of Israel, but I support the people of Israel. If piss poor government was grounds for total destruction then the US should’ve been annihilated during Trump’s presidency.

      • Miaou@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah Korea was OK, Vietnam was OK, south america was OK, the anti communist propaganda was OK, Iraq was OK, Afghanistan was OK.

        But orange man is clearly the worst of it

        • MagicShel@programming.devOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah Korea was OK, Vietnam was OK, south america was OK, the anti communist propaganda was OK, Iraq was OK, Afghanistan was OK.

          I didn’t make excuses for those. I vocally opposed Iraq at the time, although I’ll admit having the entire government lie about evidence suckered me for a short while. But look, I don’t even think any of those are the worst our country has done pre-Trump.

          But orange man is clearly the worst of it

          Yes. Oh, I acknowledge there are one or two other administrations that could lay legitimate claim to the title of “Worst. President. Ever.”, but for my money Trump takes the cake.

      • BlackNo1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        LMFAO do you think id disagree with the destruction of the us govt? nope burn that shit to the ground fuck the usa and fuck israel both deserve death

    • sandman@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      I agree.

      It’d be nice if the occupiers just left.

      I’m sure the world would be a much better place if they moved to the US.

  • MysticDaedra@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s not retaliatory unless Israel has (recently) attacked Iran, which they haven’t. It should be considered revenge, not retaliation.

    Presumably Israel will respond in force. I’d hate to be living in Tehran right now.

    • ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      7 months ago

      unless Israel has (recently) attacked Iran

      Um, did you not see the part where they blew up a fucking Iranian consulate in Syria is which Iranian sovereign soil?!

      If you don’t consider that an attack, what would your thought be if someone attacked a US or Russian consulate in another country.

      • Miaou@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        Considering what the US did after Iran stormed their embassy in Tehran, this is all very ironic, but in the sad way

    • young_broccoli@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Didn’t Israel attacked Iran’s embassy in siria like 2 weeks ago?

      It should be considered revenge, not retaliation.

      Those are synonyms.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Isn’t attacking an embassy effectively the same thing as attacking directly on that country’s soil?

    • MakePorkGreatAgain@lemmy.basedcount.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Tehran will be fine, but all of the power plants and other critical resources? if Israel can stuxnet the uranium enrichment system how difficult is it to take out basic infrastructure?