• Omgarm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    6 months ago

    No you are not engaging with the arguments I am making. Respect for what people associate with is different from a word being a slur, or treated as such. Going around calling people who does not want to be <x> is disrespectful and is harrasment but it does not make <x> a slur in a general sense.

    Cisgendered is a word to describe people’s gender identity, not for insulting.

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah it’s not a slur just like the words male and female aren’t either but they can be used with the intention to insult when directed at people not identifying as such.

      I don’t agree with labeling the term as such but I do agree with the core intention which is to prevent harrasment. I don’t quite see what the issue is here. This will not cause trouble to anyone using the term appropriately.

      • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        6 months ago

        How does the statement “the words ‘cis’ or ‘cisgendered’ are considered slurs on this platform” leave any room for appropriate use of those terms.

      • Omgarm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 months ago

        But it will cause trouble, because it is now (treated as) a slur on Twitter. Depending on how strict they are you can’t go around saying “as a cisgender” or having it in your bio.

        • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          TechCrunch reported on Tuesday that trying to publish a post using the terms “cisgender” or “cis” in the X mobile app will pop up a full-screen warning reading, “This post contains language that may be considered a slur by X and could be used in a harmful manner in violation of our rules.” It then gives you the choice of continuing to publish the post…

          Like I said earlier: context matters