• TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yes, I intentionally gave examples that were open. Some black people take offense to that label, others take offense to “African American”, or whatever. People take offense to all sorts of things. In the words of Stephen Fry, "So fucking what? It’s just a whine.”

    The point isn’t really wether it’s a correct term or not but ignoring the wish to not be called that and instead doing so with the intention to insult.

    The term is not inherently an insult, though. You would have to alter it (eg “cissy”) for it to reasonably be considered an insult by default. Merely objecting to a term that any reasonable person would see as accurate and not an insult is not enough - it would just be a whine. If it was used further after an objection, then maybe intent could be proven, but that’s not what Musk is talking about here. He’s banning the term altogether and saying it is inherently insulting, when it is not.

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      He’s not banning the term. There’s no problem using it as long as it’s used appropriately.

      TechCrunch reported on Tuesday that trying to publish a post using the terms “cisgender” or “cis” in the X mobile app will pop up a full-screen warning reading, “This post contains language that may be considered a slur by X and could be used in a harmful manner in violation of our rules.” It then gives you the choice of continuing to publish the post…

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        And I’m certain your tweet won’t be rated in any way that limits its visibility to others…