• TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Sure, but calling someone cis, even maliciously, or is very far from it being a slur. If they are harassing someone, treat them accordingly. But blanket banning the word, even when used to describe yourself or others non-maliciously, is a clear attempt to make it difficult to talk about trans issues on the platform.

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah I agree it’s not a slur. I never claimed it was. Just that it can be used to offend/insult people.

      Also they’re not banning people from using the word. Using it just prompts a message asking if you’re sure you want to post that as is the case with actual slurs aswell.

      • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        It’s considered a slur when you call a person that who doesn’t associate with the term.

        This is what you said, and what I was contesting.

        And the message discourages use of the word as what is “insulting” is entirely up the the discretion of the moderators. There should be no message, because it is not a slur. There is no historic oppression of cis people. So you don’t want to be called cis? Fine, I don’t understand it but whatever. But that doesn’t make it a slur any more than calling someone “straight” is a slur. Will they put a warning on that, too?

        • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          That’s how Elon said Twitter thinks about it. Or atleast how I understood it. That’s not what I think.

          Dictionary defines slur as “an insulting or disparaging remark or innuendo” There’s no mention about it having anything to do with oppression.