• eldavi@lemmy.ml
        1·
        3 months ago

        that website is very sus because it paints democrats who voted against gay marriage; supported anti-gay federal service members; voted for inescapable student loans; supported segregationists; etc. as only slightly more liberal than democrats that never did those things.

        i bet they either skewed the x axis or weighted some votes to get the graph to look like a continuum instead of a few distantly separated clouds.

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zipEnglish
    206·
    3 months ago

    the desperate mud slinging from the GOP is going to be hilarious. i’ll never forget when they tried to shit on AOC because she was caught gasp dancing in some student project music video.

    and god-fucking-forbid anyone ever tends bar for money

  • sbv@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    70·
    3 months ago

    is this true? I know nothing about US politics, but everything I hear from/about Bernie makes him sound awesome.

    • puppetx@lemmy.world
      52·
      3 months ago

      As a fan of Bernie this fantastic news, I want to hug the scroll if it can be corroborated.

      • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
        51·
        3 months ago

        I would imagine it depends a lot on how you quantify things, there’s all sorts of procedural votes and “renaming a post office” bills with no real substance that you could reasonably argue should or shouldn’t be included, to say nothing of ranking the partisan quality of different legislation (like, if Sanders and Harris both voted the same way in a routine budget bill that got unanimous support, should that count the same as them voting the same on some legislation he sponsored that failed or something?).

        That all said, this CNN article I found from 2020 makes it sound more true than not, but there’s some nuance - tl;dr, at the start of her career as a state AG she did some more conservativ-ish things, but she’s been consistently more and more progressive since then.

        My personal opinion is that she’s willing to change her positions a lot if she thinks that’s where voters are going, which isn’t perfect, but it’s a lot better than the last generation of Democratic leaders who are also willing to change their positions a lot but think voters are way more conservative than they actually are (because that generation is still stuck in the 1980s). Kamala didn’t start talking about Medicare for All until Bernie made it popular, but when he did she didn’t have a problem jumping on board (unlike Biden, who would only ever go as far as public option).

        • NoiseColor@startrek.website
          18·
          3 months ago

          Isn’t it good that she is willing to change her position if she thinks that’s where the voters are going. It seems to me that nobody really cares what the voters are thinking.

          • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
            12·
            3 months ago

            Yes and no imo, our political leaders should be responsive to the desires of the people they lead, but on rare occasions the people are stupid and need to be told so (e.g. for most of the 1960s, civil rights were not popular), and a lot of the time leaders need to help people recognize problems or opportunities that haven’t been widely discussed by the media or other politicians before (e.g. universal healthcare, basic income, safe drug use sites, etc.).

            Bad leaders do whatever public opinion polls say or whatever they want, good leaders find a way to do what they can without compromising on the values they ran on, great leaders find a way to move public opinion polls closer to them. Kamala is a good leader, not a great one, imo.

            • NoiseColor@startrek.website
              1·
              3 months ago

              That’s good how you replied, but your reply was very general and idealistic. What about the current situation and a pragmatic situation? I mean, besides the fact who is on the opposite side lol.

              Sorry for going into hypotheticals.

              • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
                5·
                3 months ago

                I’m not sure exactly what the question is, but with the way I defined things above I think Kamala is a good leader running against a party full of bad ones, so she’s got my vote.

                I would love a great leader that could engage and organize the general public a bit more and push opinions on things like immigration/asylum, police accountability, and trans rights and human rights in general in more positive directions, but there’s nobody with a real shot of being President who fits that description so I’ll take what I can get.

          • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
            5·
            3 months ago

            I’d prefer for candidates to be ideologically aligned but votes in the interests of people i.e. ask the constituency what’s most important to them, and voting in that direction despite ideological beliefs. I see that as a trait in Bernie, and that has yet to be established in Kamala yet.

            I’m just so fucking happy that Kamala is the candidate, the news actually made me relax a bit for the first time in a while.

        • TheSambassador@lemmy.worldEnglish
          6·
          3 months ago

          It’s one thing for a politician to say whatever to get elected and then go the opposite way. Actually changing positions based on new information and what you think is what voters need is exactly what a politician SHOULD do. I never get this complaint… I guess it’s just that people don’t trust that politicians are ever genuine?

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      48·
      3 months ago

      Pretty close to it, yeah.

      Sanders is more of a populist and idealist, while Harris is more pragmatic. Sanders has voted against a lot of things that were 95% positive because they had 5% awful shit, while Harris (and Warren, for that matter) would tend to vote for them to get policy points through. That means that while Sanders remains ‘pure’, Harris (and, again, Warren) end up being more effective.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.worldEnglish
        8·
        3 months ago

        Neat. I’m liking Harris more every day. Pragmatism is one of the core tenets of my political belief system.

        • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
          8·
          3 months ago

          Note that both of these behaviors may be valid strategies, rather than ideological fervor. As members of the Democratic Party, Harris and Warren are somewhat expected to participate in team efforts; while Sanders, by virtue of being independent, should avoid being taken from granted, as forcing other representatives to negotiate with him gives him a bit of leverage to introduce changes to bills. There’s a reason why he’s been capable of influencing so much policy despite being an outsider.

        • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
          8·
          3 months ago

          I’m… torn. I think that we need idealists to lead because they can inspire. But pragmatists get more done. I voted for Sanders in the 2016 primaries, and again in 2020, because I believe in his message. But I also voted for Biden in 2020 even though the Democratic party fucked Sanders. (I voted for Stein in 2016, because I was in a reliably blue state, and could vote for her without risking affecting anything. And man, do I regret that.)

          • Feathercrown@lemmy.worldEnglish
            8·
            3 months ago

            (RIP)

            I do think idealists are important to help inspire us to work towards the future. In terms of actual voting, pragmatism is more important IMO. There’s nothing stopping someone from doing both, if they’re good enough at both speeches and policy.

    • VonCesaw@lemmy.world
      34·
      3 months ago

      Bernie is pushing for what is standard governmental procedures in areas of Europe like France, Germany, Sweden, or Norway

      • aski3252@lemmy.world
        7·
        3 months ago

        So in Europe, it is standard govermental procedere to transfer 20% ownership of big corporations to employees? It is standard govermental procedere to have 45% of BoD elected by workers? Are you sure about that?

          • aski3252@lemmy.world
            6·
            3 months ago

            The comment wasn’t about whether worker councils are a thing or not, the comment was about Sander’s policies being “standard govermental procedure” in Europe… They aren’t… I wish they were, but they aren’t, and I don’t understand how denying reality is in any way helpful…

        • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
          6·
          3 months ago

          So in Europe, it is standard govermental procedere to transfer 20% ownership of big corporations to employees? It is standard govermental procedere to have 45% of BoD elected by workers?

          It is absolutely not standard in Europe, so have my upvote. Although there are exceptional cases such as Germany’s, where large enough companies must assign a percentage of the BoD positions to worker-elected union members.

          I’d probably put Sanders left of plenty of European social-democratic parties, roughly landing around the positions of contemporary left populist parties (Podemos, France Insoumise, old Syriza), perhaps somewhat distanced from Eurocommunist parties.

          • aski3252@lemmy.world
            2·
            3 months ago

            Although there are exceptional cases such as Germany’s, where large enough companies must assign a percentage of the BoD positions

            Codetermination/worker representation is a thing in some countries, but with the exception of Germany, it’s not half of the BoD.

            I’d probably put Sanders left of plenty of European social-democratic parties

            I’m sure there are members of social democratic politicians who are as left wing or even more left wing than Bernie. I think if he was European, he would be in the left wing of a social democratic party. But what many people don’t seem to want to realize is that we aren’t living in the 70s anymore… Europe might have some remains of social democratic elements left, but barely…

            And it certainly isn’t “standard governmental procedure”. And I do wish Bernies policies were the norm in Europe, but they simply aren’t…

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      5·
      3 months ago

      Mostly. She didn’t quite make that mark but she is between Sanders and Warren ideologically.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    50·
    3 months ago

    Should be noted that these kind of statistics are typically heavily influenced by the sheer number of garbage bills like what to rename a post office. Specific major issues is more the problem actual voters have.

    • kofe@lemmy.worldEnglish
      17·
      3 months ago

      If the stats lean closer to Bernie’s record than others (I’d have to do some research to see, but let’s assume) then it’s still more of an indication she’ll be better than the others she’s being compared to on major issues. Biden is on record saying he wouldn’t sign a bill for universal healthcare, but he’s still better than Trump overall.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        5·
        3 months ago

        Biden’s quote had a qualifying statement to that iirc. Something about without tax support?

        So it was technically saying he wouldn’t support paying for universal healthcare on credit.

        Buy, hey, he’ll pay for the Gaza genocide on credit, so who cares about the details?

    • naught101@lemmy.world
      9·
      3 months ago

      Shouldn’t those garbage bills have basically the same votes from nearly all democrat senators? So they wouldn’t really affect the differences that much, right?

      • argarath@lemmy.world
        1·
        3 months ago

        They would make the difference between them all small, thus allowing for everyone to look similar, exactly what this meme talks about

        • naught101@lemmy.world
          1·
          3 months ago

          It’s not saying her voting is similar to Sanders, it’s saying her voting is MORE similar to Sanders than other senators. Those are two very different things.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      61·
      3 months ago

      She’s a good person and a political pragmatist, who is willing to concede a point to gain ten. She has, like most intelligent adults, evolved farther and farther left to embrace reality.

      (While those in the the Wrong Wing cling to their assorted bigotries and boogiemen, as they lose all grip on sanity and embrace a venal madman as their Savior.)

      For what it’s worth, I’ve helped her in a retail context and she was the good kind of customer.

      • NegativeInf@lemmy.world
        29·
        3 months ago

        Damn. A good customer in a retail setting. Now that’s how I know someone’s an actual good person. Having worked like 10 years of retail front line, that alone make me want to vote for her more. Lol.

      • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
        16·
        3 months ago

        For what it’s worth, I’ve helped her in a retail context and she was the good kind of customer.

        Not that I needed more reason than “let’s not have fascism”, but that’s a big endorsement to me.

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          14·
          3 months ago

          Yes, it was her job, and she did it effectively. She also fought against a measure allowing juveniles to be tried in adult court, but she lost that one.

          Let’s see, prosecutor or felon, prosecutor or felon, which should I vote for? (Remember, we’re not talking about a weed felony or stealing food for a starving family here.)

          I’ll take Kamala any day. And if Trump walked in the front door where I was working retail, I’d walk out the back.

              • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.mlEnglish
                3·
                3 months ago

                I don’t think republicans are even using the excuse, they’re just doing it unabashedly

                Cops use the excuse though, I’m sure they will double down on it if their guy wins and the changes start to happen.

            • zbyte64@awful.systems
              5·
              3 months ago

              Talking about someone who doesn’t support the death penalty and Feinstein had the gall to call her out for it during a funeral.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      13·
      3 months ago

      She was never secret about it. She just got painted as a hard conservative in the 2020 primaries.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      11·
      3 months ago

      Not exactly secret, most of the stuff progressives find objectionable are basically just she had a job that progressives attach to systemic problems and didn’t throw her career away by not doing it to be a better progressive.

    • lennybird@lemmy.worldEnglish
      43·
      3 months ago

      Man I was so frustrated being called a “bernie bro” when more Bernie supporters turned out for Hillary Clinton, including me, than did Hillary Clinton supporters turn out for Barack Obama in 2008. I was tired when national head-to-head polling consistently showed Bernie Sanders outperforming Hillary against Donald Trump. Yet was shoved aside by the same sort of folks who insisted without merit that Biden should stay in the race. Quite literally some of the same people, including former Clinton strategists or the former DNC Chair, Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Even feminist leaders like Steinem and Albright claiming young women were just with Bernie because of the boys in a painfully ironic attack… It showed their true colors. The same bullshit patronizing platitudes. Alas, I am quite shocked Democrats actually organically adapted to new data. I’m honestly thrilled.

      Don’t get me wrong, I know there were trolls; I know there were astroturfers, and it got far worse in 2020. But anyone who actually went to a Bernie rally and conversed with real supporters knew that campaign was the most organic vibrant loving community since Obama’s first run, if not more so. Alas, we missed an opportunity.

      I would then go on to support Elizabeth Warren in 2020; I would ultimately then go on to vote for Biden.

      I am quite happy with her record matching Bernie. Seems like a good sign. I’ll be supporting Harris and I’m HOPING Mark Kelly as her running-mate.

      • KNova@infosec.pub
        15·
        3 months ago

        Well said.

        Don’t get me wrong, I want to burn the Democratic Party to the ground for how they evaporated enthusiastic (mostly) young voters who were aligned with what Sanders was saying in 2016 and 2020. But I won’t allow fascism to be re-elected in my pursuit of that goal.

        • Clusterfck@lemmy.sdf.org
          2·
          3 months ago

          South Park’s “Giant Douche vs Turd Sandwich” thing is seemingly more right all the time.

          We got one dude who is a massive douchebag and then another party that’s one massive shit sandwich. Either we eat the shit sandwich and deal with the fallout after or we get to stare at a giant douche for four years.

      • khannie@lemmy.worldEnglish
        5·
        3 months ago

        HOPING Mark Kelly as her running-mate.

        Only foreign skin in the game here but I think he’d be a great choice. If America voted against a Harris / Kelly ticket in favour of the other two gobshites I’d have a total meltdown. I really like America. C’mon guys. Don’t let me down.

    • nandeEbisu@lemmy.world
      5·
      3 months ago

      It’s a terrible message for trying to convert ex-republican independents. It’s not Trump’s welfare policies they object to.

      • NoiseColor@startrek.website
        5·
        3 months ago

        Yes, that would make no sense for that. It would make total sense to energise the people. Democrats don’t need to convert anyone to win, they just need to get people to vote.

        • nandeEbisu@lemmy.world
          1·
          3 months ago

          I think in swing states the numbers are close enough that you need to do both. Dems will vote if they’re afraid enough of Trump. It’s the undecideds they need to sway.

    • derek@infosec.pub
      19·
      3 months ago

      Crazy? No. The timing and optics would be wrong since Sanders wouldn’t help Harris’ campaign play to its advantages. Finding younger candidates with consistent and (hopefully) progressive records, who aren’t currently targets for the Right, and who hold little political baggage, is a better play.

      By the same reasoning I think Newsom and Buttigieg aren’t good picks even though they’d do well in the role. The new Dem Pres campaign should make sure the Right’s propagandists have to work hard at effective attack ads. Running any Left-Wing Face misses this initiative.

      For context: I’m still bitter about Bernie being pushed out of previous Presidential campaign runs, still think he was the best choice both times, and know he’d make a great VP.

    • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.worldEnglish
      5·
      3 months ago

      Primary goal for the DNC has to be to distance themselves as much as possible from the age issue. I’m not saying it will be someone young, we’re not getting someone like under 45ish, but priority has to be on getting someone who at least comes across as relatively youthful comparatively.

    • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      3·
      3 months ago

      I mean, if people think kamala is very progressive then yes. Age and policy wise. The VP should net you votes you might not otherwise get. A Midwestern pick or similar would probably do well.

  • cum@lemmy.cafeEnglish
    7·
    3 months ago

    She isn’t very charismatic though, so it’ll be hard to win with her as the DNC primary