• someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 days ago

      Every time the Dems look left they lose. They go to the center because they lose control (they need all 3 houses to do anything), so they go to the center to find voters. They’ve had control of all 3 houses for, drumroll please, 4 of the last 24 years. Want them to stop going to the center? Them give them victories.

        • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          Note how Barqs did not specify which years those were, that’s because the answer would contradict their point. Half of those four years were Obama’s first, after he campaigned to the left on a message of hope and change but before his actual administration revealed him to be just another moderate.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 days ago

      As opposed to trying to make things better and avoid more suffering for everyone.

      Accelerationists have never lived through what they claim to want because if they did, and lived, they would no longer be accelerationists.

        • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          I’m not an accellerationist, and as a transgender furry from a red state I’d hazard a bet that I’ve got more consequences to worry about than you do.

          Quit treating treating politics like a team sport. This is not a game, this is a life or death struggle to take the reigns of the American Empire in time to do something about the climate, the genocide, the economy, and everything.

          • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            I’ll take you at your word, which is trying, but even if true I prefaced my statement with original. This means you’re part of the plan, and you would have to be. Though you may not identify as accelerationist your existence is spurred on and enunicated by a foreign effort to defeat America by turning it on itself.

            Edit: My bad

            • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              Again, I’m not an accelerationist. I’m a “Stop doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result”-ist.

              And don’t tell me you’ll take me at my word and then immediately do the opposite. It makes me suspect that you are the thing you accuse me of being.

              • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                8 days ago

                You call yourself what ever you like. I’ll refer to you as, useful idiot.

                Edit: If I were a foreign actor I’m either very incompetent or am a genius for egging on you doubling down.

                • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  I see you have taken the mask off entirely.

                  If you were genuinely invested in the election, you’d be desperately trying to find common ground in the hopes of convincing me to vote for your preferred candidate.

                  Instead, you’re being both dismissive and disrespectful without even putting in the effort to ensure that the insult hits home, exactly the sort of behavior one would expect from a low-effort troll.

                  Lucky for you, I’m autistic enough to enjoy feeding the trolls~.

              • LengAwaits@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                The only way you can look at the world right now and say “we’re doing the same thing over and over” is if you choose to ignore unfathomable swaths of nuance in some reductionist attempt to protect your own sense of self-righteousness.

                • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  Electorally, I disagree. The Democrats have been triangulating towards the “center” since before I was born while the Republicans keep tacking right. When Trump loses and the post-election, post-failed-coup-part-deux infighting tears the Republican party apart, the Democrats will be the new right-wing.

                  • LengAwaits@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 days ago

                    I don’t really disagree with this, and in fact it sounds optimistic to me, provided you’re asserting that a new party will be born from the broken duopoly that your prediction will cause. Which you may not be. I’m not trying to put words in your mouth.

                    Edit: On second thought, I do somewhat disagree, as watching the democratic party flirt with and ultimately push back against a Candidate Sanders in 2016 definitely seems like a deviation from the plot-line you’ve presented. I can envision a future in which the Dem party is captured by further left factions as young people grow up and become more and more engaged with electoralism.

      • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        Doing the same thing you’ve always done isn’t “trying to make things better”, it’s “trying to make things stay the same”.

        If you want to avoid suffering, you have to be against genocide.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          My opinion is that you’re incorrect inside wrong wrapped in no.

          But I appreciate you’re hanging in there because I’m pretending you really care about stopping genocide. In the United States you could work for the BIA if you really cared about these things but I don’t know what the options are wherever you are.

    • Lauchs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 days ago

      I mean, that or all the angry young/middle age voters could, gasp show up to the primaries and move the party to the direction they’d like to see. Instead, the elderly voters, despite being a much smaller share of the population, outvote the heck out of them.

      If folks like you paid attention to politics when it matters, not just when it was trendy, things would be a lot different.

      Then again, reading what you’ve written, maybe it’s for the best y’all don’t.

      • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        I love the idealism, I lost mine decades ago.

        Realistically, this is America we’re talking about. A literal pandemic that killed millions was only worth a 16% bump in the total vote count. The sooner you come to terms with the fact that this country is not and has never been a real democracy, the sooner you’ll be able to stop relying on the electoral system to save the world.

        Also, I resent the assertion that I don’t pay attention to politics. I pay too much attention to politics. To the point that I predicted this exact scenario for the 2024 election back in 2015 when the DNC first started openly conspiring against Bernie, months before they ratfucked him out of the primary. I was the only person among my family and friends not to be surprised when Hillary lost in 2016. I knew the incumbent for 2024 would have to drop out to give the VP a chance at winning against Trump literally years before we learned that Biden was going to be that incumbent. I feel like Cassandra, cursed with foreknowledge that none will heed.

        Anyways, the problem isn’t “trends” or a lack of interest from the youth, the fundamental issue is that electoral politics is a trap. Do vote in local and national elections, of course, but if voting is all you’re putting your energy into then you’re doing it wrong. And our political media ecosystem is designed to ensure that most people do it wrong by investing literal billions into election campaign coverage.

        The real forefront of American politics is the union movement. Now that they’re starting to throw off their old business-friendly management and implementing democratic processes for replacing them, they’re taking position to become the driving force behind the new left. Watch for that over the next few years as the Republican party falls apart from the blowback against Trump’s attempts to steal the election while the Democrats continue triangulating to the right to pick up the “moderate” leftovers and alienating their own left wing.

          • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Harris won the moment Biden dropped out. That’s why the Democrats have already started moving right and touting Republican endorsements, they know they’ve got this election on lock and they’re getting a head-start on signalling another “business-friendly” administration.

            Trump’s supporters will throw a tantrum as reality starts to seep in, so expect a significant increase in stochastic terrorism and maybe even a (dis-)organized coup attempt. There will be casualties, but the true believers have been inflating their numbers to maintain the image of a contestable election and will severely overestimate their ability to overthrow the government.