The car bombing outside a California fertility clinic that killed one person and injured four others appears to have been driven by anti-natalist ideology, according to two senior law enforcement officials briefed on the incident.

The suspect, identified by authorities as Guy Edward Bartkus, is believed to have carried out Saturday’s explosion, which resulted in his own death.

Investigators are focusing on social media posts made by the suspect, including a 30-minute audio recording, which they say support anti-natalist views. While the posts and the recording are still being verified, officials believe they reflect the ideology behind the bombing. Anti-natalism refers to the belief that no one should have children.

  • Ciderpunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Hasn’t Elon been complaining about anti-natalists being the worst people alive? Seems awfully convenient that all of the sudden there’d be something for that dipshit to point at as “proof” anti-natalists are evil.

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    1 day ago

    This immediately makes me think this is a plot to make “anti-natalism” considered terrorism. Not a single person I know of who is against having kids is radical about it, but oh man are the pro birth weird Christians sure radical about it.

    • Stern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Having been to the antinatalist subreddit back when I still visited the other place, I can say there were deffo some weird folks in there and that as a matter of statistics I could see one or two being that far gone. This also applied to most of the other anti-thing places there though, ex. Two million subscribers to r/atheism, that’s two “one in a million” whackjobs.

      • CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        That’s kind of where I’m at, I see bad people in every single camp. Every single one. It’s no big deal, that’s human nature, but we can’t gatekeep radicals out of any camp. I see some pretty radical people on here, wishing death on people & such.

        Not everything that happens has to be a massive conspiracy; something like this was bound to happen sooner or later. All kinds of people get really riled up over IVF.

      • Twinklebreeze @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The childfree subreddit was pretty toxic, too. Calling people with kids mombies cause they think they’re better than them. 🙄

        • Stern@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Or calling the kids crotchspawn and wombfruit. Like bruh I get it, y’all ain’t having kids, fair play, but there’s no need for the weird slur nonsense.

        • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Not producing more children when so many are abandoned and the planet is dying is morally superior to people who create extra lives in the same situation.

          • pahlimur@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            I saw a comment like this years ago. Its why I called it that the child free movement would create radical idiots like in the article. Radical idiots usually require an assumption of moral superiority.

  • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Anti natalist… I doubt they’d have to do something so overt to reduce humanities birth rate. This has false flag written all over it. And correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t it the religious right that’s anti fertility clinic?

    • CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s so fresh, we’re operating on limited information, and idk if we can really say if it’s false flag or not. Which, funnily enough, is the desired result of a false flag. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I do think it’s rather odd that the man killed himself, blew himself up in the car. A la rented Tesla Cybertruck terrorist, granted he wasn’t that fucking dumb, but it’s in the same vein & same method. And outcome.

      I’m not one to hand out advice for conducting domestic terrorism, but let’s just say I’d do it differently.

      The religious right is very much split on IVF, especially since Trump approved it. The true religious right is anti-IVF because it’s not natural, you do “sinful” /unnatural things in the process, homosexuals or singles sometimes create children, mistakes happen mixing wrong egg/sperm creating bastard children, and finally the destruction of fertilized human embryos. They really don’t like that, they view it as abortion on steroids. Then the more…utilitarian?..religious right doesn’t focus too much on the mistakes, the masturbation, the destruction of fertilized human embryos. They focus on helping infertile couples & the children created from that process. And again, Trump cautiously giving IVF blessing & in the future, maybe even funding has turned religious right’s opinion on IVF. Positively.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      23 hours ago

      And correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t it the religious right that’s anti fertility clinic?

      No they’re anti-abortion and anti-birth management, not anti-fertility. Religious nuts are hypocrites and what part of the Bible talks about IVF? Prolly none.

      It might genuinely just be a bitter angry person. I don’t even like to call it an ideology, they just complain they had no choice in whether they were brought to this world, ans and since the world sucks, they pretend like if somehow they could’ve chosen, they would’ve chosen not to even live, which makes no sense, as then they’d never have been a person with the capacity to think that. It’s paradoxical, is my point.

      I wouldn’t be surprised that just general whackos like that do exist, but yeah, you’re right, it wouldn’t be out of line to false flag it to create even further infighting in the states.

      To be honest it’s probably not even much of a challenge for some Russian disinfo agents to convince someone to firebomb shit like that. When people are denied healthcare and housing and the streets are flooded with opioids and guns, it doesn’t take much to find a person easy to manipulate.

      So it might be both “real” and also politically puppeteered. That would make the most sense, honestly, but we need to remember that these sort of ultraviolent psychopaths aren’t really… thinking straight.

      We’d like to make it make sense, but acts of violence rarely do.

      • astutemural@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        No, they’re anti-IVF too. It stems from the fact that many embryos are fertilized but only a few are implanted. The rest are discarded. To the christofacists, this means they’re ‘killing children’.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Oh right yeah if you combine anti-abortion views like that with anti-science, yeah, I can definitely your point, yeah.

      • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I’m not arguing your points. It just seems like the only group cutting funding and research for IVF is the conservative wing. Also, many religions nut jobs see women who need IVF as imperfect vessels, and men that need IVF as not men.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Well there’s religious nuts who oppose damn near everything, so I’m not surprised.

          I’m just pointing out that they’re not traditionally against fertility treatments, although as some are anti-science (which is traditional for religious people), they are also coincidentally anti-IVF etc.

          But like, their main point isn’t being against increasing fertility, it’s being against “unnatural science” or smth.

  • don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    With the cuntservatives pushing their antiabortion agenda, makes sense some people are going to believe the opposite.