• MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    243
    ·
    6 months ago

    It is hard to believe this moron has a chance of being president again. We are a doomed country.

    • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      115
      ·
      6 months ago

      Don’t let the media and talking heads convince you of anything.

      There are a great majority of people who want nothing to do with Trump, his Russian bootlicking or any of his other xenophobic hate.

      Just vote.

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        51
        ·
        6 months ago

        But the system is rigged so that a relatively small minority of morons can fuck shit up for everybody else. So yeah, guys, vote like your life depends on it because it literally does.

        • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          And those of us who are voting and get elected will, and have been, continue to stop vote rigging, jerrymandering, and voter intimidation.

          Voting doesn’t end at the end of the presidential election. It involves your local elections too. Especially anything to do with your local educational system.

        • SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          It’s not a relatively small minority. Trump has lost the popular vote every time he’s run, but not by huge margins. There are a lot of people that legitimately want Trump as a president, and many more that view him as the lesser of two evils. Don’t underestimate that and definitely don’t let down your guard.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        He’s the Republican nominee. What do you mean by letting “the media and talking heads convince you of anything?” Based on the previous two presidential elections, he’s got a 50/50 shot which says a lot about his opponent.

        • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          In what world does the number of candidates have anything to do with hundred of millions of peoples independent votes.

          This is just bad stats

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            In this world. He already won one election and came very close to winning the second back in 2020. Combine that with yet another weak-ass Dem candidate being the only other option and you have a recipe where it’s entirely possible for him to win again.

            • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              You’re comparing apples to oranges here. The circumstances have changed since 2020 and to ignore 4 years of hearings, charges, additional threats (much less vague now) and libertarian distain for trump is significantly different from what it was when he ran in 2016, and when he had that momentum in 2020 (Covid year, don’t forget)

              Donald Trump is going to bite the curb this election and I’ll bet you a bunch of people still vote for RFK.

              • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Yeah this sounds a lot like pollsters claiming that Clinton had a 99% chance of winning in 2016.

                Biden seems to be going out of his way to alienate progressive voters and conservative voters will never vote for him. The ‘fence sitters’ who don’t pay attention to politics will simply see inflation and high prices and blame whomever is currently holding office due to all the conditioning and rhetoric they hear regarding it.

                Any election should see a guy like Trump defeated in a landslide, but that’s not the reality we live in and the guy running against him is doing such a poor job that Trump might actually win again.

                • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I agree with your final paragraph. He isn’t a perfect candidate.

                  But I don’t think there will ever be a perfect candidate and when they’re running against a literal fascist dictator, I know who I will vote for. I’ve said this before but a primarily 2-party system is dangerously naïve. Simplifying the insanely complex reality that is the US into 2 options is stupid. Not to mention how much it alienates minorities (of all types not just race, religion, sex)

                  How are we to represent down to the minority level via a popular-vote. It doesn’t make sense to me.

          • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            The world where out of the 400 RNC candidates filed through the FEC, Trump was the one that people have been voting for in the primaries by a landslide.

            There were 161 Million total registered voters in 2022, and 335 Million total USA Population, so even if tens of millions of people, a comparatively small fraction, vote for Donald Trump then he can very easily win this election.

      • takeda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Exactly, and even if it might seem like your single vote doesn’t matter, you would be surprised. trump won in 2016 because disinformation on social media convinced people that their vote won’t change anything and Hillary will win anyway.

        Also vote at least every 2 years, it isn’t just the president that matters, the Congress is important too

        • Valmond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Congress is more imortant than the president by the looks from an outsider.

          How is the house reps elected in the USA?

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            By district, which is all the voters in a smaller geographic area. House Reps are up for re election every 2 years. The intent of the House is to give more representatives to states with higher populations, so for example New York has 26 representatives while Kansas only has 4.

            However, instead of purely representing population, the number of House reps has been capped at 435, which weighs heavily in favor of less populated (Republican) states. If that cap was removed, Democrats would have a permanent lock on the House.

    • tooLikeTheNope@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I don’t know.

      I’m perplexed honestly.

      I live in italy and here too government took a steep turn to the right since last elections.

      It is like the most roborantly bamboozling idiocy someone from a stage can scream the more he gets applauded as the folks’ hero for speaking their unsung voices.

      On the other hand if you try to build an organic and critical dialogue you only get yawned away as utterly boring.

      I don’t think it is the ones screaming from their stages being the morons, well not the most moron at least, but instead they are those who give their precious votes, hard conquered from their ancestors who gift them with a life in a democracy, to these unambiguously unmistakable frauds, and who hide in the self-obliviousness of the guilty conscience for the vote they have cast their incapability of admitting their own deep existential self-inadequacy.

      • Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 months ago

        Lots of people are incredibly stupid. Many of those stupid people are also selfish and mean. It will always be easy to appeal to those people by blaming all their problems on others. Until science figures out a way to force on the empathy parts of our brains, we’ll go through these cycles of stupid people cheering on fascism.

    • Veedem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      6 months ago

      Thank you.

      That Gizmodo article is HORRIBLY written up and there never actually mention the quote outside of the blurb beneath the headline so the lack of context had me questioning them. Pretty shitty reporting.

      • overload@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s so damn annoying. I’m not sure how algorithms are supposed to suppress BS alarmist articles without being accused of bias either.

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          This is a great article to fact check the crapnout of, but because people like the “facts” it gets a pass.

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      6 months ago

      Which is funny since Biden has the exact same position, which is why he expanded on Trump’s trade war with China by upping tariffs on EVs to 100%. I highly doubt Biden would let China do the Mexico workaround either, if he can help it.

      • takeda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Did China even produce anything in Mexico, my understanding is that they want to produce everything internally.

        • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          They’re trying to bring the European side of manufacturing to Hungary. We Hungarians are unhappy about it, because they get subsidized like hell.

          • takeda@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            What’s with that?

            I recently read an article that he is allowing to install China’s face tracking cameras in Hungary. I first thought that he was installing it for his own benefit and just got the technology from China, but this actually will be used by China.

            While I might grasp his unexplained love for putin, this looks like just selling your country to foreign autocracies.

            • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              Well, a lot of boomers think office work isn’t real work, a deadweight on the economy, and will turn kids gay thus not making (great-)grandchildren due to not getting dirty and having an air conditioner. The previous system somehow reproduced the toxic Calvinist work morals of capitalist countries, and not only the politically illiterate calls this kind of behavior “communism”, but there’s a very big number of the pensioners, whose votes can be bought by promising more underpaid manual labor to their (grand)children.

              The camera thing might be him getting more and more afraid. He’s losing popularity, and even if he crushes popular movements (often by “doomerism”), there are more and more popping up. If the AI bubble burst (which will cause a financial recession) or some of his allies will fall, he can also fall too. He’s a paranoid maniac that goes everywhere in a bullet vest. He just loves his fellow autocrats, especially as he can work together with them.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        100% tariff on cars imported from China makes them unsellable. However there’s a free trade agreement with Mexico so GM and Ford can use the cheap labor.

        Many people have pointed that out as a loophole and BYD has announced a factory on Mexico. If we wanted to block importing Chinese cars from Mexico, while still allowing GMs and Fords, we’d have to take additional action. This just means both candidates have vowed they would

        • takeda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          As you said, this would require an additional action.

          And to me it looks like it can’t be done by EO and would have to be a legislation. And during trump very few legislations got passed even when they had a majority.

          The restrictions on sale through Mexico can be implemented when it actually is a problem.

          I found an article where they announced a factory in Mexico, but it first have to be built. The news also appears to be before the sanctions were announced. So if that factory was meant for US market this could change their plans, as adding 100% sanctions signals determination to plugin other loopholes.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      They are just trying to one-up each other as always. Children in old-man bodies.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is just naked corruption, making promises to the oil execs he’s been trying to curry favor with, right? Because apart from that - the thing that might put more money in Trump’s pocket - I can’t fathom what the point would be.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 months ago

      To “own da libz.”

      He’s pandering to the section of his base who all drive lifted coal rollin’ diesel trucks who all know that “everyone knows” electric vehicle owners are all avocado toast eating homosexuals who vote Democrat.

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s a double win for him. Yes, he’s courting automakers and the oil and gas industry, so this gets him that, but a giant percentage of his base is simply against anything that liberals are for. Think of those idiots rolling coal. They’re literally making their cars as polluting as possible. What do they gain from it? The only thing it does, besides contributing to climate change, is upset liberals, and that’s the goal. Every one of those people will support this.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think you’re overanalyzing things.

      He’s a liar and a con man and he’s just telling his supporters what they want to hear. Tomorrow, he’ll tell his other supporters that he’s going to do the exact opposite because that’s what they want to hear. There is no consistency or underlying ideal other than telling people what they want to hear so that he can get more support.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      95
      ·
      6 months ago

      Elon will donate a few mil to his campaign, and Tesla will end up being the only company allowed to sell them.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      This will eat 80% of Tesla profits, so he will probably ask Tesla to hurry up with the $56 billion he think he is owed.
      Tesla stock would plummet even faster than they have recently.

      Then he will try to convince Trump to use SpaceX for his Space Force, and have Trump implanted with a chip from Neuralink so he can remote control him. 😋 And then blame any problems on the Jews.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Trump just confused things (Hailey, Pelosi, Biden, Obama etc). What he means is that he will ban European cars built in Mexico, but allow Tesla produced in China.

      I’m half serious, because that’s much more consistent with his policies in 2017-2020

    • cultsuperstar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Well Elon and Trump supposedly talk several times a month, so it’s probably Elon telling Trump to block non American EV sales here. But there’s really no telling what they’re talking about.

  • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    6 months ago

    Working at the onion must be so. hard. right now

    “Donald Trump will kill ‘at least seven prostitutes’ while in office.”

    No… how about “Donald Trump sings the entire National Anthem on key.”

    “Donald Trump finally unmasked as secret santa in Harlem children’s program.”

    Wait… I think I unlocked a secret.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    6 months ago

    That’s a funny way to get the auto companies and unions in the three states Biden really needs to go all in on Biden.

    I’m confused. Both of them seem to be trying to lose this election.

    • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Why? Better margins on gas cars, I think industrial Michigan would love this because it means they won’t be squeezed into electric car manufacturing. I get told by big 3 engineers that if it wasn’t for the subsidies they wouldn’t be electrifying their fleets. The consumer may not like it, unions may not like it, but the companies could give a damn.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        I get told by big 3 engineers that if it wasn’t for the subsidies they wouldn’t be electrifying their fleets.

        We’ve been subsidizing ICE vehicles for the better part of the last century. Famously, Bush Jr passed enormous tax cuts for SUVs and other “light trucks” back in 2003.

        Congress recently passed a tax bill, as proposed in President Bush’s economic stimulus plan, that offers a $100,000 tax credit for business owners who purchase any vehicle weighing 6,000 pounds or more when fully loaded.

        Because these rules didn’t require a business to exist for a minimum length of time or post a profit, car dealerships would help buyers spin up small businesses on the spot in order to avail themselves of the credit. SUVs flooded the market and have been a load on the national car fleet ever since.

        Now we’re pivoting to electric vehicles in order to stay competitive globally, and (fossil fuel endorsed) business magazines have suddenly started poo-pooing the idea of vehicle subsidies as unnatural. Curious.

        • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah, that corporate tax credit is also why the Ford F-150 is the most commonly purchased vehicle by millionaires and billionaires. It’s the smallest vehicle able to be classified as a work truck, to qualify for tax credits. They can basically deduct the entire cost of the vehicle on their taxes, because they purchase it through a shell corporation (of which they’re the sole owner and operator.)

  • akilou@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    6 months ago

    The party of limiting personal freedom.

    If I want to buy an electric car, why shouldn’t I be able to?

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      If I want to buy an electric car, why shouldn’t I be able to?

      Because you are only allowed personal freedoms if you express them like every other white conservative and fit a very narrowly defined picture of American culture, ethnicity and gender identity.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m beginning to think he doesn’t have values of his own and has discovered that he can easily keep dangling simplistic talking points in front of America’s most ignorant and most vulnerable segment of simpletons and morons.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        I might take it one step further and say that these aren’t Trump’s ideas. These are fossil fuel industry talking points that get pumped through a rich network of right wing talk radio dorks and Brietbart style news feeds and Joe Rogan guests.

        Trump and his ilk are just the guys who can turn a talking point about “nobody is buying electric cars” into a real policy of “nobody is allowed to buy electric cars from over the border”.

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          The probability we’re going to have Trump for a second term is so much higher than anyone realizes and it terrifies me every time some Millennial/GenZ shrugs and says “there’s no way that dude is getting in” with no intention of voting, because I have seen all this before.

          • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Younger folks are just electorally apathetic. This isn’t exclusive to GenZ and Millenials, if you look back on voter records in the '60s and '70s, even the young boomers at the time also did not vote in droves. It is an age thing more than any specific generational traits.

      • DMBFFF@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        “It a beautiful wall, a fantastic wall, just look at it, ain’t it the best wall ever built? Didn’t I tell you, ‘promise made, promise kept.’?”

  • Doxatek@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t like Trump either. But as others here have said he didn’t say this. That’s a quote from the article the quote from him says “You won’t be able to sell those cars” not “I’ll ban all electric car sales”

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        One implies he will personally forbid them from selling.

        The other implies no one will want to buy them because they’ll be too expensive by their nature.

        • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          4 years of Trump as president, and people are still trying to see nuance in what he says? Were you asleep from 2017-2020? We know enough about how he talks to know what he means. He’s absolutely talking about blocking EV sales.

          • prole@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            It’s unreal. I’m convinced people are just collectively too stupid to ever fully escape this constant pull towards fascism.

            We should maybe start getting used to the idea that we had a nice century or so of relative freedom and prosperity, and we’re lucky to have been alive during it.

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              He is still a dangerous cheat, corrupted, megalomaniac, and kind of stupid and easily manipulated. It’s just that he probably didn’t mean a ban in this case.

              Just because he is dangerous doesn’t mean we should also embrace misinformation against him. Plenty of legitimate information is damning enough, to embrace misinformation sites nothing but undermine the legitimate reasons to keep him the hell away from leadership.

              • prole@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                I will accept just about anything to stop the fascism from taking control of our country at this point.

                This has already been a propaganda war, the left just sucks at it. And when you’re up against people willing to fight dirty with the future of the Republic at stake, and you’re not willing to meet them at their level, you lose every time. And this is something we cannot lose.

                So no, I’m ok with interpreting what we all fucking know he meant anyway, based on the ridiculous way he speaks and having to listen to it constantly for the past decade. I’m ok with that little stretch if it means my gay and trans friends in Florida don’t end up against the fucking wall in a year and a half.

                It’s starting to get dire. I really don’t think people grasp what happens if he wins again. And it will happen quickly.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Precisely because he says so much dangerous and stupid stuff we shouldn’t feel the need to potentially misrepresent something else.

            Like I can tactically see why Fox News latched into just the dumbest stuff for Obama because Obama didn’t give them anything legitimate to work with to discredit him. Trump about hourly does or says something so terrible that we shouldn’t have to resort to potentially misrepresenting stuff.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I was not saying he is correct, saying that was his likely meaning in this context. He’s not exactly got a great track record of being smart or correct. Just in this case he didn’t seem to mean a ban outright.

    • Devcatdan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 months ago

      Why are people downvoting this? Trump is a literal poison, but misinformation is misinformation. The author changed the meaning: “You won’t be able to sell those cars, because they won’t have EV incentives” NOT “because I’ll ban them.”

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Trump is a literal poison, but misinformation is misinformation.

        Trump: “Won’t someone rid me of these meddlesome electric vehicles?!”

        Media: “Trump calls for elimination of electric vehicles.”

        Terminally Online Guy: “Um, aktuly, its ephebophilia”.

    • WldFyre@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 months ago

      “You won’t be able to have an abortion, I never said I’d ban it, though!”