Clearly, Google is serious about trying to oust ad blockers from its browser, or at least those extensions with fuller (V2) levels of functionality. One of the crucial twists with V3 is that it prevents the use of remotely hosted code – as a security measure – but this also means ad blockers can’t update their filter lists without going through Google’s review process. What does that mean? Way slower updates for said filters, which hampers the ability of the ad-blocking extension to keep up with the necessary changes to stay effective.

(This isn’t just about browsers, either, as the war on advert dodgers extends to YouTube, too, as we’ve seen in recent months).

At any rate, Google is playing with fire here somewhat – or Firefox, perhaps we should say – as this may be the shove some folks need to get them considering another of the best web browsers out there aside from Chrome. Mozilla, the maker of Firefox, has vowed to maintain support for V2 extensions, while introducing support for V3 alongside to give folks a choice (now there’s a radical idea).

    • 5dh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 hour ago

      It sorta protected Chrome’s monopoly in the browser world for years. Now that they’ve established that monopoly firmly, it’s time to crack down on things that diminish monetisation.

  • sandbox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    5 hours ago

    We’re going to have a serious problem on our hands soon with compatibility. I’m a software dev and I’m already seeing a few issues here and there where Chrome is being treated as the default expected browser and features don’t work on Firefox.

    Firefox doesn’t support a fair few Chrome features because of security and privacy reasons, such as WebHID, WebUSB, etc.

    Devs, please stop using those features. I know it’s tempting, but they’re basically bribes to encourage you to sell out to Google. Don’t do it.

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 hours ago

      We’re going to have a serious problem on our hands soon with compatibility. I’m a software dev and I’m already seeing a few issues here and there where Chrome is being treated as the default expected browser and features don’t work on Firefox.

      It’s basically IE6 and ActiveX all over again.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 minutes ago

      Google’s working on fixing that for you right now. That’s more people switch to Firefox and there’s futures don’t work they’ll start complaining to the developers and then to Firefox. Microsoft road the it only works in IE train for a long time and it eventually buried them

    • spookedintownsville@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      35 minutes ago

      Most “Chrome-only” web applications I have to use I can get around just by changing my user agent string and everything works fine. I try not to use that stuff when I can, though.

      • sandbox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        24 minutes ago

        Some of the older stuff is indeed that way, but there are more and more features which Firefox can’t support. Web-based custom keyboard configuration tools, tools to flash phone firmware, and one niche MiniDisc tool all are chrome-only things I’ve had to open Chrome to use

      • Frays6142@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        60 minutes ago

        Teams works in Firefox, I sadly have to use it almost every day interacting with clients who use teams for comms.

    • pumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’m using Firefox as my only browser. If everything works in Firefox that’s fine for me.

      That’s the best advantage of only making websites / web applications for fun (for friend groups, video games, family etc)

      • sandbox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Yeah, but that’s my point, not everything works in Firefox now - even though admittedly it’s relatively niche stuff - and my prediction is that if we continue on our current course Firefox will either have to compromise their commitment to privacy and security or will become more and more unusable.

        • Kronusdark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          45 minutes ago

          I saw this quote a while back “if you only make code that works in chrome you aren’t a web developer, you are a google developer.”

  • wabafee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It’s going to be internet explorer era again. I wonder which will replace chrome in the future.

    • hjjanger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      How? If you would have said Chromium based era, then sure, possible. Internet Explorer for 64 bit was officially retired June 15, 2022 and permanently disabled through an Edge update.

      • nonfuinoncuro@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        54 minutes ago

        it’s not literally just an analogy how a single browser guided by private corporate interests is treated as the only standard

  • hjjanger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    A web extension isn’t going to be that much of a game changer for Firefox. Usage is down, new profile rate is down, concerning financials towards Firefox and this issue has been ongoing for sometime with ublock. This isn’t meant to diss ublock though.

    I don’t have much hope for Mozilla attracting more users to make userbase count impact. Hopefully overpaid execs proves my pessimism wrong about my favorite browser.

  • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I find it funny how so many people are switching back to firefox but its been my default since I was like 10. I had crappy laptops when I was young and it was the only one that worked, it works amazingly for my modern computer.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yeah, I remember when Chrome was first released, I was already on Firefox, and I downloaded and tried Chrome…

      I absolutely hated the UI, and kept on using Firefox.

      Over the years, I have seen many articles about how Chrome is better because it is faster, I never had an issue with Firefox, so I kept using it.

      The only time I swiched from Firefox since version 1.0 was when they launched the Australis redesign as it made it look like a boring chrome copy.

      I swiched to Pale Moon, a Fitefox fork which kept the old UI, then when they released the Quantum redesign, I switched back.

  • Harvey656@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    9 hours ago

    While this will drive some users to Firefox, we all know it won’t be enough. Too many people simple don’t know, or don’t care, it won’t affect their lives in any meaningful way, or so they will believe. Google will be harming the tech illiterate and normies (sorry for the slur) because money, bullshit, and to drive the stake deeper into the monopoly. If you have older family members using chrome, sit them down and explain to them the dangers of the internet without adblock.

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It gets me thinking. Tech literate people are the types to install blockers, and would be the same type of people both motivated and knowledgeable about how to switch browsers. On the line of thinking it seems like it is just going to drive them away from Chrome. Tech illiterate people remain unaffected since they are getting ads anyway.

      But then on the other hand, if someone is tech literate then why are they even still using Chrome? Does such a person value whatever advantage Chrome theoretically provides over their ad-blocking?

      • shneancy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 hours ago

        as a chromium browser user - i’ve been meaning to switch to firefox, and i know it’ll take me maybe a day, but it feels like so much workkkk. In a similar fashion i’ve been meaning to switch to Linux for ages too. I guess it just hasn’t gotten bad enough for me to take action

        as long as my adblockers & script blockers work, i’m not forced to upgrade to win11, and win10 still has security updates i don’t think it’s pushing on my discomfort buttons strong enough. I know the day will come, but like with a lot of things in my life - why do something today when i can do it tomorrow?

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          What do you mean “work”? What is it that needs to move?

          You just fire up Firefox and start using it. It’ll even scrape your chrome setup to move bookmarks and stuff over.

          It’s not an OS. It’s an application.

          • shneancy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            i don’t use chrome itself. i have a lot of saved things, roughly a million tabs open at every moment, and passwords saved which i do not remember

            • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 minutes ago

              This is all mostly automatically transfered over… I don’t know about passwords though

            • wanderingmagus@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              47 minutes ago

              There’s extensions to export all your open tabs and then a similar extension to import those tabs and open them as a session in Firefox. Source: I, too, have a million tabs open at every moment, and had to do that to transition myself. Same for exporting/importing passwords.

        • Yi K@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          That’s some procrastination going on. Sometimes you should force yourself to start doing something for a minute or so and things will eventually change.

        • jape@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I feel you. It’s vey much a convenience thing, and sitting down with something you’re used to.

    • forgotaboutlaye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      If you have older family members, you could try just installing Firefox for them and tell them it’s their internet now. This worked for me parents.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 minutes ago

        Not for mine, they couldn’t make the switch even though everything was the same

        I even changed the icon to Chrome’s

  • VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The Fox has been re-promoted to my daily driver as of this year. Chrome still in play for work stuff & sites don’t have ads.

    • 5dh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Agreed, but I don’t understand the point of this image? Am I dumb?

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Make sure to shit on them every fucking time anyone says the name “Mozilla”, that’ll help us not have anything except Chrome in a couple years.

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It’s fine, there are open source projects underway. If any one of them gains traction, it could happen to Mozilla what happened to Unity with Godot. Here’s to hoping they get their act straight sooner tan later.

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Oh, bullshit. There is nothing that has 1/100th of the effort that goes into gecko, because maintaining a web browser is ridiculously difficult. You’re living in a dreamworld if you think any other project is within a lightyear of Firefox.

          • gwen@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            7 hours ago

            idk why people think that these foss projects will be fully finished super quickly every time mozilla or google does some stupid shit. firefox exists solely because of googles funding due to web browsers being expensive/difficult to maintain. the effort being made for ladybird is amazing, but holy shit we are NOT gonna be at the ‘firefox and chrome alternative’ level unless they gain massive funding.

            maybe i should get back into gemini

      • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Before chrome became massively popular, Firefox was very popular. ie was still the most used browser back then