• Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        You’re right, it’s totally fine that he doesn’t do anything to put it on the agenda.

        Because he’s not a literal king, we can’t criticise him for ignoring people’s needs and failing to say or do anything to push for something that is not only sorely needed but extremely popular across political divides.

        It’s totally fine that the entire dem primary field was talking about medicare for all when a popular candidate was forcing them to, and then we didn’t hear one word about it after everyone rallied together to force that guy out. Don’t criticise in election season, you don’t want Trump do you?

        I mean, give him some time! He’s just a new baby president! Everyone knows you get a few months to just kind of chill and get a feel for the space.

        Oh but we can’t talk about it now, look at what the republicans are doing, it’s just such a crisis right now, we’re just reacting to their crazy antics!

        Oh we lost congress in the midterms, now we can’t do anything.

        Listen, you can’t expect the president to actually do anything. Because he’s not a literal king.

        Fucking libs. You spend all your time telling us to follow a process, and when the process gets nothing done, you tell us not to blame you, it’s just the process! It’s just hard, and slow, and it takes time, and we really need to wait for another four or eight or twelve years, and then maybe another dem will get elected and kind of partially undo some of the damage the last guy did and not actually make any progress to make up for it.

        And when we try to point this out, you call us whiny little babies who aren’t educated and mature enough to sit around waiting for Godot to finally pull his thumb out and show up.

        • Alteon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          10 months ago

          Look, change is slow. Especially so when dealing with government. The Democrat party is also split between centrists and progressives, and this divide will only grow as more and more young people start to vote. Those changes that we all want to see are also being hammered by a Republican controlled House. Nothing is going to get through there - Biden can groan and moan all he wants, but it won’t do anything. But it’s not like he’s not doing anything…

          He’s trying to lower costs of healthcare and prescriptions.

          He’s strengthened Medicare.

          He actively prevent Medicare cuts by passing a Bill back in 2022.

          He’s not doing “nothing”. He’s working with what he’s got.

          I mean. I get that there’s a lot of complaints, but to say he’s not doing anything is incorrect. I mean, sure, do I wish more progress was made? Yeah, but I’m not going to blame Biden for it. Now, if Biden had control of the House and Senate, and this shit still didn’t happen…oh yeah, I’d be feisty right now.

          • hark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            Change is not inherently slow, there’s just a vested interest by those with power granted by the status quo to stop it or slow it as much as possible. They don’t want it to change unless they can ensure they keep their power (or expand on it) with the change.

          • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            The rate of change is mostly set by the population. It’s historically slow, because the majority is usually slow to adapt. Change can also be fast (e.g. revolutions), when leadership is completely out of touch with reality.

          • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I love how you took all the criticisms I had and then just repeated them back at me as if they were justifications.

            Like, oh wow, look at those extremely marginal, far-too-little-far-too-late incremental changes that do nothing to address the fundamentally broken parts of the healthcare system.

            I didn’t say he wasn’t doing anything at all, I said he doesn’t push for what is actually needed. He has the bully pulpit, and he won’t use it. He won’t make executive orders that force the issue and make congress reply. He isn’t wielding power, he is just marking time, giving the bare minimum concessions to make gullible fools believe he’s worth their support, and then he’ll hand power right back to the fascists when it’s their turn again, as it inevitably will be.

            Actual progress was always won by mass action. It was fought and bled for, and it doesn’t matter what kind of politician they are, they will kill to stop it because they depend on the political system for their power, and mass action threatens that system.

          • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            It makes no difference to me, I don’t know you, but it’s fascinating you felt the need to insert yourself into the conversation just to announce that you’re not listening.

            • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I just got through about half of it and it was absolute garbage. I was offended someone spent the time to write it down.

              stomps feet dam libs!!

              • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                So was it the length, or that sentiment in particular?

                Because long comments you agree with are fine, I assume, so what about that phrase made you turn off?

          • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Several sources within the Biden campaign told Politico that the 2020 Democratic candidate would not run for reelection in 2024

            Unnamed sources within the campaign, not Biden and only on background. Strong take, pal.

            • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              I’m not the one who made him 82 years old. Be mad at time. Oh right, it’s my fault you have to vote for walking corpse.

      • doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        Pretty sure anything that touches the budget in any way other than minor allocation changes is strictly congress’ business.

        For example, when he tried to forgive student loans several years ago he was empowered to do so by a law from 2003 which allowed the Secretary of Education to change rules and waive amounts during an emergency such as 9/11 or a Pandemic. And State AGs still sued him over it and won, despite that legislature.

        • demesisx@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I wonder if the

          2008 legislation that he wrote eliminating student loan bankruptcy forgiveness in exchange for $250,000 from MBNA

          got in his way too!

          Vote blue no matter who $hitlibs are counting on people not being able to do basic research and just taking their corruption apologia at face value.

            • demesisx@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              No shit!

              What I intend to communicate is that Biden has never been, in any way, serious about any of the focus-grouped, means-tested student loan forgiveness programs that he has been pretending to work toward. He and his advisors clearly know full well that his buddies in Congress will NEVER, EVER pass it. It’s like the overdraft fee thing recently that doesn’t take effect until 2025 and will absolutely be eliminated by Congress before it even takes effect.

              They think we’re stupid.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    This meme is full of shit:

    First Biden term: Increased health benefits for veterans, lowered insurance premiums for people who sign up through ACA, opened special enrollment resulting in 2.5 million Americans signing up for insurance, lowered the cost of insulin, streamlined ACA applications, removed medical coverage caps for children, increased transparency in pharmaceutical pricing, investing 2.5 billion in mental health, expanded telehealth across the nation, especially for rural communities.

    The American healthcare system sucks, and Biden has made definite significant improvements to make it suck less for tens of millions of people in just a few years.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Boy are you nominally correct but entirely wrong on sentiment, clarity and motivation.

        My previous comment, about American healthcare being terrible, disclaims your ostensibly argumentative position and is a review of having used the American healthcare system 15 years ago and not having used it since because of how terrible it is.

        I am not advocating for using the American healthcare system, I am correcting the incorrect opinion that Biden is not focusing on health care, while accessible and affordable healthcare is a primary concern of the Biden administration that he has significantly addressed with executive support about a dozen times in his first term.

        Since Americans keep voting for and buying into the private health care system, Biden is making the option American citizens are choosing and American corporations are pushing, more affordable and accessible.

        His administration is doing the best they can with what American citizens choose to pay for and American corporations choose to provide.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Yes, your non-concerns are my non-concerns as well.

            The OP is what I have a problem with and what my comments are addressing, the incorrect blaming of Biden for a legacy private healthcare system, especially when it has been a primary focus of Biden’s administration to correct as much as it can within the contemporary system.

            Biden has done amazing work in less than four years to give tens of millions of people affordable and accessible health care, as well as working on ACA.

            Americans are voting within the two-party system within the current American for-profit medical infrastructure, and neither of these two parties want badly enough to change the contemporary health care system.

            While it is impossible to get quality, affordable health care in the current American system without being born into it or getting lucky, it is very simple to go abroad for the purpose of medical tourism.

            Flights anywhere in the world are a couple hundred dollars, and healthcare is easily half of what it is in the states while achieving a similar medical outcome, and often even cheaper, so you’re saving hundreds to tens of thousands of dollars easily with any non-urgent operation.

            This may not be as convenient as other services Americans expect, but as they are living within and paying into an exploitative health care system, it is what many Americans are looking for.

            Less money, less time, equitable healthcare.

              • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                10 months ago

                Close, Biden provided a better healthcare at an affordable price that people were asking for instead of providing a new health care that people were not asking for.

  • carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    10 months ago

    As I have said before and will say again the president is not a dictator.

    Spending bills must originate in the house which is currently controlled by the party of no. You can threaten not to vote all you want but you will only hurt yourself.

    As it is this meme is just misleading.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 months ago

      The president has the most powerful tool at his disposal: The bully pulpit.

      The president is the de facto leader of the political party, the president can make anything a headline in every news source, and the president has very deep pockets to make use of these powers.

      For all of their flaws, both the Bush and Trump administrations used these tools to their advantage. They picked something they wanted, and made it happen through heavy pressure on their part members up and down that various branches of government, through directions given to appointed department heads, through heavy media blitz and through every other avenue of influence they have.

      Biden has done a better job than his democratic predecessor to use these powers, but no Democrat in the white house in recent memory has used these powers like the republicans do

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        So you’re solution is to just make everything a sideshow cuz it worked once for a sideshow.

      • conquer4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        He is probably reluctant because being apart of Obama’s use of it to reform social security, Medicare, and pass affordable care act. Only to be burned and be a lame duck for 6 years

        • PugJesus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          Well, that’s the metaphor it’s going for. It’s ‘retail’, going in for small amounts of voters, rather than ‘wholesale’, going in for large amounts.

    • kralk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      The thing about retail politics is we just saw a republican primary where everyone was doing retail politics EXCEPT the guy who easily won. I hope Biden’s team is smarter than that.

  • Coldgoron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    10 months ago

    How about some inflation regulation so I can afford a place to live or you know the rest of the hierarchy of needs.

  • cultsuperstar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Biden can come up with the best healthcare plan ever and the GOP won’t approve it because Biden/liberals/Democrats/etc.

      • conquer4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        10 months ago

        Biden was apart of the affordable care act, I think he knows better than a majority of people how hard it is to pass any sort of Healthcare bill. In this day and age, Republicans would vote against founding social security, to give you a idea about how obstructionist they are.

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Biden has been a part of the corrupt system for decades and has contributed to it greatly himself. His stupid ass insisted on working with republicans early on in his presidency, after eight years of being Obama’s VP. I dunno, maybe he thought him being white would change things, and maybe he isn’t as keen on that stance now, but I’ve yet to see him or his party take action on actual change instead of bandaids. Meanwhile republicans are allowed to pull every dirty trick in the book to instate full-on fascism. When can I have a democratic party that fights as hard as republicans but for the people?

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Effort, time, and political capital are finite. The opportunity cost of even getting a M4A bill to committee in the Senate is huge and even trying without filibuster reform and having a comfortable majority in both chambers odds downright stupid. You’re not actually this dumb, right?

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Republicans do these stupid things all the time and it works. The overton window is so far to the right, that you think a center-right politician like Biden is a glorious hero of the people. If it’s stupid and it works, then it’s not really stupid, now is it?

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m British, and it’s a cornerstone of our society. While the Tories have been trying to grind it down for over a decade, I still believe that if the NHS were scrapped we’d see full-scale, national riots.

      Sadly, I agree. While the president does not get to dictate this, I always maintain that you get the politicians you deserve. There aren’t enough widespread calls for nationalised healthcare in America…so why would Biden do it to appease a small percentage of people? If you actually wanted it, you’d promote a career politician that focuses on this movement.

      • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I also live in Britain. Unfortunately, a crippled free healthcare cannot be commended too much too. I have heard of people having to wait months for their second appointment after a cancer diagnosis.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I mean its not much better right now in the 'states. My wife had to wait months to see a numerologist after 3 concussions in as many months at work, and became severely depressed from the near constant migraines and everything else that comes with such a situation. My sister in law suffers from severe Trigeminal Neuralgia which for her is only treatable with a minor surgery every 2-8 years. This disorder has a reputation for resulting in significantly more deaths by suicide than any other cause. She has to wait months to get her arguably life-saving surgery every time its come up (and that’s been twice in the time that I’ve known her)

          • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            sorry to hear that having to pay insurance for crappy healthcare is a nightmare indeed. nevertheless what is happening in the US or UK both boils down the same thing, bad political decisions from people who are mostly after personal gains.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      The majority of Americans support it, its generally only the wealthy who oppose it because they would pay more in taxation and can’t cut in line.

      • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Don’t the average american right wing voters think free healthcare and taxing the rich is (evil) communism?