• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think ‘limit’ is fine as long as that limit is under levels safe for infant consumption. It’s probably not possible to make baby food entirely free of heavy metals because they’re basically everywhere. But it is possible to make them with heavy metals under a specific safety threshold.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          Getting to 100% in anything is really fucking hard - some shits occasionally going to go wrong and that’s unavoidable.

        • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Fun fact there is no safe limit of lead to eat. It’s a forever metal so once it is in you it never leaves and will only continue to hurt you.

          • numberfour002@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            6 months ago

            It’s a forever metal so once it is in you it never leaves and will only continue to hurt you.

            Citation desired. All references I’m seeing explicitly state that lead is eventually excreted in urine and feces.

            • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              In bones, lead can take 25-30 years to leave the body. Actually, this is true of many types of heavy metal poisoning (and radiation, eg radium), and bone loss as we get older tends to release these compounds. This is part of why they believe there’s a delay with ALS and Alzheimers between when you ingest heavy metal and when you actually develop symptoms.

              In older adults, the primary source of lead exposure can be endogenous. Excretion of lead is relatively slow, and accumulation is common [31]. During early and middle life, lead is sequestered in the bones, where it replaces calcium in the hydroxyapatite structure [32]. The skeleton contains 70–95% of the body burden of lead where lead can remain for decades [32], which can be exploited for exposure assessment research. Adults experiencing loss of bone mass via osteoporosis release lead into the bloodstream. In older adults, 40–70% of blood lead can be attributed to previous body stores [32]. Lead that entered the body during previous periods of high exposure can become biologically active decades later.

              https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7454042/

              https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0161813X20301352

            • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              If we limited use of fossil fuel vehicles on farmland, that would help a lot. The exhaust from tractors along with the bits of tires left in fields etc all put heavy metals in our food supply. As it is, almost all farmland in the US needs bioremediation to reduce heavy metals in their soils.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 months ago

      What’s more depressing is that there have been 2,291 bills and amendments addressing ingredients in baby food since 1951. They range from limits on toxins to excessive additives and sugars. Most fail at introduction thanks to the lobbying power of Nestlé, who owns Gerber.

      Business ethics require legislation in the US.

      https://www.congress.gov/search

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      Hey, if baby consumers didn’t want heavy metals in their food they’d chose a competitor - the market has signaled that its in favor of poison. /s

    • motor_spirit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      Well tbf have the babies submitted a compelling case through the proper channels? Maybe they can peacefully assemble to make a difference… that’s how christians have won their battles

    • Gork@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      Baby Formula! Now with 12% less Lead than the leading brand!

        • Gork@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Hmm that’s a tough trade-off. More developmental disabilities, but is the Value™ really there to justify the decreased cost?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      I don’t know, but if you take them to Russia and teach them to say “fuck Putin,” they’ll get their recommended daily dose of polonium.

    • Norgur@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      I will not let them take my babies daily intake of arsenic and mercury away!

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Without led in their system, how are we going to develop the next generation of psychopaths and right wing voters?

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 months ago

    TIL in the US they need an extra law to limit harmful substances in (baby) food. Normal people would call this “common sense”, but it seems to be rather uncommon in the US.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      The FDA was supposed to just be regulating this as their job already. I’m not sure why they need a specific law, but I’m just going to assume the answer is Reagan.

      • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        If the FDA, FTC, USDA, EPA, Depts of Transportation, and CDC wanted to guarantee and check their work, we’d have universal healthcare. And in fact I think that’s exactly the legal argument for why the government should be FORCED to provide us healthcare - how else would we be able to catch (and class action sue for) large community-wide health hazards such as:

        -asbestos in baby powder

        -lead and heavy metals in vitamins and supplements

        -consistency of dosing in medications

        -Deaths from auto accidents when we should be having trains

        -Deaths from contaminated eggs, meat, milk from bird flu or other pathogens

        -Products that are blatant lies/false

        -Companies leaking chemicals into water supplies

        -Lead in water supply

        -Heavy metals in water supply& in crops, from exhaust from cars and bits of tires

        -imminent looming climate change

        Gee, I wonder why corporations are scared of us getting healthcare?

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    I am genuinely surprised that this isn’t already in place for all foods. We’ve known about the harm they cause for a very long time.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Klobuchar, Krishnamoorthi, Duckworth, and Cárdenas. All Democratic senators.

      It was originally put forth by Krishnamoorthi late last year.